My Coins:

200 coins

Basic Package

Buzdy Basic Coin Package

Standard Package

Buzdy Standard Coin Package

Premium Package

Buzdy Premium Coin Package

my wishlist

Notifications

BuzdyStocksApple
AAPL

Apple — what the record actually shows

NASDAQ NMS - GLOBAL MARKET · Technology
$309.35
The bottom line

Of 1,003 past one-year holding periods for Apple, 83% ended in profit. In the typical case $100 became $116. The worst year on record was -30.6% and the best was +59.4%. It scores 20/100 on our risk scale, which we call low — that is relative to the other assets on this site, not a judgement that it is safe.

Market cap$4.51TNASDAQ NMS - GLOBAL MARKET
History used1,255trading days
Where today sits 73% of 252-day range

If you had put $100 in — every past year

1,003 periods
83% of one-year holding periods ended in profit. Every trading day is a starting point; we count what the next year did. This is history, not a forecast.
Bad year$94-6.4% · 1 in 10 worse
Typical$116+15.5% · median
Good year$138+38.4% · 1 in 10 better
2 -40%
21 -30%
35 -20%
112 -10%
205 0%
206 10%
211 20%
118 30%
61 40%
32 50%

Each bar counts how many one-year periods finished in that range. Red is a loss, green is a gain. Fees and spread are not included.

Risk score

20
low on our scale
out of 100 · 1 factor
Volatility 20

Higher means more can go wrong. This is not advice to buy or sell. Only one factor could be measured for this asset, so read the number as that factor alone. A low score does not mean safe — this page's own worst year is the better guide to that.

What the chart says today

RSI 1447.3 NEUTRAL vs upper band-8.5% MACDFALLING Volume0.8× 30-DAY AVG 200-day trendABOVE

We calculate these on our own server from 1,255 days of prices, so the figures on this page are the same ones our assistant is given. Nothing is read off a picture.

Have these signals actually worked on Apple?

tested on its own history
RSI > 70 → price lower
It went the other way 56% of the time. Treat this signal as unreliable here.
44%
117 times
RSI < 30 → price higher
Held up 84% of the time over 14 days.
84%
31 times
Above upper Bollinger → price lower
It went the other way 69% of the time. Treat this signal as unreliable here.
31%
81 times
Volume 2x average → move over 10%
It went the other way 75% of the time. Treat this signal as unreliable here.
25%
32 times

Most sites show you a signal. We also show you how often it was right — including when it was wrong. A rate near 50% means the signal told you nothing on this asset.

How Apple compares

$100 · one year · same maths
Stock Bad year Typical Good year Ended in profit
Apple (this page) $94 $116 $138 83%
Gold (GLD) $100 $123 $152 89%
NVIDIA $74 $162 $325 86%
S&P 500 (SPY) $89 $116 $129 82%
Nasdaq 100 (QQQ) $81 $124 $141 82%
Palantir $43 $208 $493 78%
Amazon $65 $116 $162 76%

Showing 6 of 14. The full table, other holding periods and cross-market sorting are Pro features.

Everything above stays free
Pro adds the parts that take work rather than reading: all holding periods, the full comparison table across crypto and stocks, filtering by win rate and risk, and unlimited questions to the assistant.
See Pro
What this page is, and is not. Every figure here is either a fact as of today or a count of what has already happened to Apple. Nothing on this page is a prediction, and none of it is advice to buy or sell. Past behaviour is not a promise about the future@if($class === 'crypto') — that is especially true in crypto, where an asset can behave nothing like its own record@endif.

One caveat worth understanding. The holding periods we count start on every trading day, so they overlap heavily — yesterday's year and today's year share all but one day. That means they are not 1,003 independent experiments; a single long run up or down colours a great many of them at once. It is an honest picture of what holding this asset felt like, not a sample you can do statistics on. Dividends are not included, so a share paying a steady dividend did better than the figure here shows. We do not show unlock dates, because the data source for them is not something we can verify for free, and we would rather leave a gap than guess. Buzdy is free to compare and does not take a commission on anything you do next.